New Virtualization Calculator from VMware
VMware released a new virtualization costs calculator. This “Cost-Per-Application” calculator compares the acquisition cost of VMware VI3 versus HyperV with SCVMM.
It is a really easy to use calculator, which requires a minimum input from the user. It enables to download the results so you can alter more parameters to create a more specific fit to your organization.
Rich Brambley at vmetc.com published a nice article about this new virtualization calculator released by VMware. I was thinking of posting more about it myself but having read Rich’s post I reckoned why? I like the article and it saves me some time so here is a teaser, click on the “read more” link below to read the full article at vmetc.com.
VMware has announced a new online calculator that specifically compares the total cost of implementing VI 3.X and Microsoft Hyper-V. An online tool similar to Microsoft’s competitive calculator introduced last year, the VMware Virtualization Cost-Per-Application Calculator is designed to emphasize that the cost of implementing virtual infrastructure is more than the expense of licenses. In the past many have criticized the cost of VMware’s flagship suite of VI 3.X Enterprise products as too expensive, and with both Citrix and Microsoft now claiming to offer free hypervisors, VMware’s new calculator helps illustrate the message that VM density at equal performance matters to the cost analysis bottom line.
“Following the lead of analysts and customers, VMware has adopted “cost per application” as a more accurate metric to compare costs between virtualization solutions. Going beyond a simplistic license price comparison, evaluating cost per application takes into consideration the number of virtual machines that can be run on a single server, or the ”virtual machine density” enabled by a specific virtualization solution. The higher the virtual machine density enabled, the higher the server consolidation ratio. The higher the consolidation ratio, the more an organization can reduce its infrastructure costs (including costs for servers, networking. storage, power and datacenter space), and software costs, (including guest operating system and virtualization software licenses). Following this logic, the solution that can provide the higher consolidation of servers – without an impact to performance – also provides the most value to customers.”
I decided to test the calculator with a 50 VM / application example.
Check the latest comments
- Mark Achtemichuk on Designing vSphere Platforms for Maximum Tier 1 Application Performance #BCA2817
- Dustin Snijders on VMworld Zoetermeer edition – KPN Consulting
- Anyone home? « Adventures in systems land on DELL announces integration of acquisitions in vStart offering
- Jij komt toch ook naar het Dutch VMUG Event 2009? | Virtual Lifestyle on It’s Official: Dutch VMUG meeting 2009 on December 11th 2009
- Matt O on Connecting ESX to SAN: PCI Device resource allocation failure
Blogroll
- Arne Fokkema
- Bjorn Bats
- Bouke Groenescheij
- David Marshall
- Duncan Epping
- Edwin Friesen
- Eric Sloof
- Frank Denneman
- Gabrie van Zanten
- Hugo Peeters
- Ivo Beerens
- Joep Piscaer
- Kenneth van Ditmarsch
- Manlio Frizzi
- Mike Laverick
- Richard Garsthagen
- Roy Mikes
- Sander Daems
- Simon Long
- The official Dutch VMUG
- Tomas ten Dam
- Vincent Vliege
- Virtual Strategy Magazine
- virtualfuture.info
- Virtualization.info
- VMGuru.nl
Archive








